Friday, April 1, 2011

"Chisholm Admits That He is Liable and Consents to Judgment Against Him"

It's over. Johnny Chisholm is now the first circuit promoter in history to have been successfully sued for fraud.

Yes, the long awaited settlements in the two civil cases we've been following have finally been filed. Although looking at the terms, it appears more a capitulation than a settlement.

First, here's how the DeForest case wraps up:


Keep in mind DeForest's initial investment, the amount in dispute, was $150,000. So, this consent judgment for $175,000 gives Ray DeForest what he lost, plus $25,000 for his time and trouble (although realistically, I suspect much of that has already been spent in attorney fees and court costs).

Other key terms: Chisholm gives up any right to appeal, and the right to discharge the judgment in bankruptcy. The judgment also accrues interest at 7% per annum as long as it goes unpaid.

And very prominently, first clause at the top: "Chisholm admits that he is liable and consents to judgment against him in this matter." He also admits for the record that DeForest did indeed successfully extricate himself from the disaster that was OMP Paris on May 24, 2007, well before the event flopped.

As far as Chisholm's co-defendant Bobby Warner goes, she's simply been let go from the lawsuit ("Dismissal with Prejudice"):



And here's how the Bardfield case wraps up:


The consent judgment here is for $300,000, $100,000 more than the $200,000 Bardfield and Carver were fraudulently induced to part with. Other terms are similar (7% per annum, no appeal or bankruptcy, full Chisholm admission of liability).

Plus there's an injunction forcing Chisholm to forfeit all money held in those frozen bank accounts "in connection with his unlawful enterprise," i.e., One Mighty Weekend 2009.

So, the total amount Johnny Chisholm admitted liability and consented to judgment for was $475,000.

All that remains, I think, is for the judge to sign off on those consent judgments, and for both cases to be formally closed. Once that occurs I'll let you all know. Shouldn't be long ...

Addendum 4/2/2011: The judge signs off on the consent judgment in the DeForest case:


Addendum 4/3/2011: And here's the order for the Bardfield case:


And with that, I'd say this blog is now at an end. In other words, barring very unusual circumstances, I don't anticipate any new posts, although the blog will still be open for comments.

I hope you all found it as interesting and informative to read as I found it enjoyable to research and write.

And let me just end here, on one final nostalgic note:

"Johnny Chisholm proves once again what many have already determined...he IS the King of Circuit and a student of the "philosophical school of Circuit reinvention." He has the dreams and ability to bring back the parties we nearly lost only a few short years ago due to greed, mismanagement, and pessimism. The quiet, polite and honorable Johnny Chisholm has once again taken the Circuit, and those of us who follow the Circuit, to a whole new level. And the world is Johnny Chisholm's oyster! ...

... Johnny Chisholm was JustCircuit's very first inductee into the Circuit Hall of Fame(tm), and for very good reason. The Circuit is still alive, changing, and growing in part because of the innovation, optimism and hard work by Chisholm and his entire team. The bar has certainly been set high for others who desire to create a successful Circuit party. The Circuit anxiously awaits Johnny Chisholm's next dream."


-- Shane Alan Rogers, January 25, 2007

20 comments:

  1. Finally! It's been a long time coming! Thanks for keeping up with this.

    ReplyDelete
  2. It is so funny how JustCircuit isn't "reporting" any of this. You should put a link to their website directly to their support of Johnny's lies from those years.

    ReplyDelete
  3. "You should put a link to their website directly to their support of Johnny's lies from those years."

    Just browse through the timeline posts here and here to get a really good sense of that.

    Come to think to think of it, this is highly amusing too, now bathed in the full afterglow of hindsight. Just Circuit's selection criteria certainly speaks volumes about their character.

    ReplyDelete
  4. No kidding, at least Johnny Chisholm is somewhat "likeable!" -those two just make everyone's skin crawl. Sad to see Mark using them to promote GD.

    Glad to hear these guys are getting some money back, but I'd guess their attorney fees are huge.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Maybe someone should send a note to Mark about them and ask why?

    ReplyDelete
  6. I know the revulsion factor of seeing Just Circuit as a sponsor on Mark's events is going to keep many people away this year, yes.

    ReplyDelete
  7. It's what stopped us from considering it.

    ReplyDelete
  8. It's only been a week and just got my first just circuit email promoting memorial day pensacola, aka Johnny weekend.

    It's a shame that Mark Baker would associate with them.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Shane & Victor from JUSTJERKIT are the biggest shitstirrers and troublemakers in this scene. Nobody cares for they tacky magazine or for them in general. These 2 clowns should be ignored forever.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Thank you for sticking with this case and keeping us informed. I am really glad that there is finally some personal responsibility laid upon Mr. Chisholm, and I am very glad the plaintiffs are hopefully going to see something out of this. Unfortunately, this still doesn't make it up to those who lost out in the various bankruptcies. I think that is probably one of the most discouraging things I learned in this blog - how Mr. Chisholm created all of these "corporations," that shielded him from personal responsibility, even though he was controlling all of them - and certainly drawing a hefty salary from all of them. Then he took advantage of the lax bankruptcy laws in this country to get out of his commitments. Sure, Disney and Universal can absorb these losses, but what about the small businesses and individuals that will never see the money owed to them. I would carry a huge amount of shame.


    Some of the best times of my life have been at Gay Days, dancing in the middle of the Studios, fireworks overhead, with several thousand of my closest friends. And, I have to be honest and thank Mr. Chisholm for some really spectacular times. But, I will never attend one of his events again, or support any of his continuing businesses.

    The spirit is already returning to Gay Days, and hopefully 2011 will be a great year in Orlando - my 14th year attending.

    Thank you again for all your efforts in this blog!

    ReplyDelete
  11. Has anyone notified the Pensacola venue's that this judgement has happened?
    Seems like Memorial weekend is just an attempt by Chisholm to get money from
    unsuspecting attendees and not have an event.

    Unfortunate that justcircuit is scaring away guys from going. Every event they partner with seems to fail. Paradise Festival was a disaster with less than 100 people.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Paradise Festival ... I actually had to Google that to see what it was.

    And as far as Pensacola goes, his main party venue is usually the beach, right? And of course Emerald City which he still technically owns.

    Frankly I hope his events MDW do see some success, so as to pay off his long-suffering lawsuit and bankruptcy creditors.

    ReplyDelete
  13. "...to bring back the parties we nearly lost only a few short years ago due to greed, mismanagement, and pessimism."

    This quote makes me laugh. The only people who would believe this are the two frauds who made it up, Shane and Victor.

    Gay Days was seeing explosive growth which fell apart after JC renamed the weekend and started screwing suppliers, and I doubt that when Chisholm bought the big parties from Mark Baker and the hotel contracts and Reunion from Brian Bottoff that he got any "bargain" deals -he paid full hundreds of thousands of dollars for both.

    So really why does Mark have anything to do with Just Circuit?

    ReplyDelete
  14. I hear that more paperwork has been filed with the court due to Johnny's non-compliance. I know, shocking.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Interesting, let me check on it ... but yeah, can't say I'd be surprised. Stay tuned ...

    ReplyDelete
  16. No activity on the fraud (ie, civil) cases. Those are still wrapped up. So, any new filing over non-compliance would be in one of the many bankruptcies, most likely. Again, not terribly surprising.

    ReplyDelete
  17. And they're at it again. http://www.onemightyweekend.com http://justcircuit.com

    ReplyDelete
  18. Yep. I'll tell people here what I've been saying on other forums to people who have asked my opinion, and to the reporter from Orlando who interviewed me the other day:

    You'd have to be a crazed loon to buy a pre-sale ticket to these events.

    If you really must go to any one of these parties, buy your ticket at the door, DAY OF the event.

    Arabian Nights is a cavernous venue ensuring that there IS ABSOLUTELY NO CHANCE of even coming near a sellout. Especially if competing parties take place. So, you have nothing to lose by exercising everyday prudence and waiting until the day of the event, and actually seeing with your own two eyes whether these parties will actually take place. Believe it only when you see it.

    And that's really all I have to say. If you need further persuasion, then just re-read this blog. Re-read the documents. They speak for themselves, and I don't see how I could add much more than I have already provided.

    ReplyDelete
  19. You are obsessed. Regrow some nuts and try being a man. Your story is old; you are bitter; the party world goes on. This party was always a great party and I like that it's coming back out of a cavernous ballroom and back to where it belongs. Don't like it? Don't go. Keep the hate in San Diego.

    ReplyDelete
  20. If you like it, that's fine. Just buy your ticket at the door. Don't take a chance of being a victim like all the boys who got swindled during the last fiasco, that's all that I'm saying.

    Giving good advice hardly amounts to an obsession. Have a nice day!

    ReplyDelete